Thanks for the clarification Andreas. I'm running around 600k objects in memory, which should be around 586MB of overhead.
If I could ask you guys your opinion -- is there a better way to configure Varnish for my environment? My backend is 22TB of mapping tiles, each file being anywhere from 100bytes to 3KB. So a small 4GB cache results in just being an LRU, caching the most popular tiles. Which makes outer zoom levels very fast, but misses on almost all of the low parcel levels. Thanks for any advice! --Cal On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:11:20PM -0500, Cal Heldenbrand wrote: > > > > Here's a screenshot of top. This machine was set to malloc max at > 5500MB. > > And it hasn't passed that. Remember that there's additional overhead of > about > 1KB/object outside the actual storage backend. > > > SMA.s0.g_bytes 5595155188 . Bytes outstanding > > It has allocated 5.5G > > > SMA.Transient.g_bytes 0 . Bytes outstanding > > And isn't gobbling up transient space at the moment. > > I don't see a problem (in varnish at least). > > -- > Andreas >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
