On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:34:51PM +0200, Per Buer wrote: > > According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-6.1.1 - the reason > phrase is meant for human consumption and you're allowed to say whatever > you'd like here. The reason phrase is required by the RFC and the question > is whether Varnish should require it or not. After all, it isn't used for > anything so I don't see a reason why we should require it. Then again, we > cannot be faulted for declaring a backend sick when it is in violation of > the protocol.
I think it's ok to ignore it. Because Postel. -- Andreas _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
