On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:24:07PM +0200, Lasse Karstensen wrote: > I've been running some benchmarks to see how master stands up to the earlier > version. > One of the metrics are time-to-first-byte, which I've got (preliminary) > results for now.
I should also mention that I'm running this on 4 year old hardware, so the numbers are primarily useful for comparing new vs old. fryer1 hw: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz kernel: 3.2.0-51-generic On my 2 year old X220 Thinkpad the numbers for Varnish 3.0 are much better: (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz) with debian wheezy: (3.2.0-4-amd64)) localhost:6081 (2013-09-23 14:35:16.566675 on immer) -------------------------------------------------- mean: 93.045μs (stdev 0.000001108) median: 92.959μs mean: 136.669μs (stdev 0.000039922) median: 147.365μs mean: 145.904μs (stdev 0.000005585) median: 144.362μs mean: 135.787μs (stdev 0.000012227) median: 136.225μs mean: 137.303μs (stdev 0.000008220) median: 138.007μs -- With regards, Lasse Karstensen Varnish Software AS _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
