Hi Geoff, The intention was exactly as you guess, that the regular expression should only be applied to records that has the tag that goes with the regex. So this is indeed a bug. I will apply the patch. Thanks :)
Martin On 10 October 2013 11:59, Geoff Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry about that empty mail. > > While trying to learn to use logexpect, I noticed that for expectations > like these: > > expect 0 * FixedTag > expect * = FooTag reg.x* > > ... it would attempt the regex match for every log entry after the > FixedTag, regardless of whether the entry has the FooTag. It continues > until it hits an entry with a match, which may or may not have the FooTag. > > I may have misunderstood the intention here, but the attached patch > ensures that the regex match is only attempted for log entries with the > expected tag. > > > Best, > Geoff > -- > ** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung > > Scheffelstraße 32 > 22301 Hamburg > > Tel +49 40 2880 5731 > Mob +49 176 636 90917 > Fax +49 40 42949753 > > http://uplex.de > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev > -- <http://varnish-software.com>*Martin Blix Grydeland* Senior Developer | Varnish Software AS Cell: +47 21 98 92 60 We Make Websites Fly!
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
