On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected]> wrote:
> [..] > > I was looking at your diff I don't understand the >> -Wno-missing-field-initializers vs -Wno-extra. If the compiler doesn't >> support >> the former why add the -Wno-extra instead of just not adding >> -Wno-missing... ? >> > > Hm, your question seems to contain the answer ;) > If the compiler does not support -Wno-missing-field-initializers, we > can't use -Wno-missing-field-initializers, so we have to use -Wno-extra And answering to myself: to silence the otherwise warning added by -Wextra. Because -Werror is there. > [..] >> So both checks are doing the same. Can you share the config.log? >> > > Notice that gcc is invoked with -c for the first and -o for the second > case. It's no surprise to me that the second test only fails on an exotic > OS (read: OpenSolaris) :P > You are absolutely right, missed that. f.-
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
