Does this mean that doing it in vfp_gzip_init() or cache_gzip.c would be appropriate or preferred?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > -------- > In message <[email protected]>, Nils Goroll writes: > >On 26/08/14 12:46, Nils Goroll wrote: > >> But I think this needs to live in fetch (before calling v_b_r) > > > >After further discussion, it became clear that vfp_gzip_init or at least > some > >code in cache_gzip.c could be an even better place. > > The intent is that VFP's become self-contained entities so that > for instance GZIP/GUNZIP and TESTGUNZIP will use their init-> functions > to mangle headers as appropriate. > > We're not *quite* there yet, and there is a complication in relation > to how we mangle IMS-fetched objects headers which I have not found > a good solution to yet. > > As always: if you spot any wrong behaviour, by all means tell me! > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
