For anyone not following the commit msgs: phk has just fixed this in
f2caddcff6d2018604b2ab83ec9bf0e12ec4d51a


On 26/08/14 19:59, Nils Goroll wrote:
> What might be even more confusing is the fact that reading the ttl a second
> later in vcl_hit will give 59 (seconds remaining in cache).
> 
> If Age is larger than the ttl we set in VCL, the object won't get cached at 
> all.
> 
> 
> I think we should make this consistent and easier to understand.

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to