--------
In message <cajv_h0yful+omcfckxad+d9nox__aprylk17wa4m5cm6f-x...@mail.gmail.com>
, Federico Schwindt writes:
>I thought about this and decided to go for rfc1123() as time() would
>indicate a TIME input with .integer(), .ip() and .real().
I simply don't grok that.
The idea behind the conversion functions is
std.${typename}(${convert_this}, ${use_this_if_you_cant})
Nothing prevents
std.time("Mon Dec 15 20:11:04 UTC 2014", std.now())
and
std.time("1418674264", std.now())
from giving the same result ?
>The other options I had in mind were datetime() and date() but I liked
>rfc1123() best.
I really hate rfc1123 as a name...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
