On 28/12/14 23:02, Artur Bergman wrote: > Apparently mnot disagrees in general but allows for it in certain cases
Hm. What else could he say when asked this way? The interesting point is: How can an intermediate know for which headers "empty" equals "non existent" if the rfcs don't make any statement about this? (or do they and I haven't found the right place?) Tackling it from the other end: Who can name a single example where an empty request header has any other semantics than "same as if it wasn't there"? At any rate, phk is most likely right about treating these as two distinct cases for Vary, but without any example for the contrary, I still think it should be ok to merge them. On the other hand, it's most likely an irrelevant discussion... Nils _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
