On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Rogier 'DocWilco' Mulhuijzen < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dridi's suggestion of "vcache" is better than my "vrun". >> > > I agree. It's way more recognizable as being varnish related than "vrun" > or "vworker". > Spell it out: "varnishcache"? Or are there actually relevant systems that still can't handle more than 8 bytes? (I hate to feel like I'm bikeshedding. I don't intend any statement about what the words are, just suggesting that they not be abbreviated.) -- As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not confidential. Any middle-man or recipient may inspect, modify, copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless said parties are otherwise obligated. As the sender, I acknowledge that I have a lower expectation of the control and privacy of this message than I would a post-card. Further, nothing in this message is legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity. http://bilbo.hobbiton.org/wiki/Eat_My_Sig
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
