--------
In message <cajv_h0ydhxvwu-bje6meaerqqs0skltvzbay8q9jankbvg-...@mail.gmail.com>,
 Federico Schwindt writes:

>This is only called when doing return(synth(..)) so I believe it makes
>sense to call it VRT_synth (before it was done on return(error(..)) thus
>VRT_error).
>
>Whether we should keep the SLT_Debug is a different story IMO but logic
>above still applies.

I don't quite have enough OCD to think we need to rename it, but I
certainly think the SLT_Debug can go.  (Also the XXXX miss from
the other email).

If you feel strongly about the rename, then go ahead.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to