On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > -------- > In message > <cabovn9cgc0ckap8um1z3gzawprmrjg-chysrdbf9x+ye_z_...@mail.gmail.com>, Dridi > Boukelmoune writes: >>So, miniobj.h is undefined behaviour, huh. > > Uhm no ? > > miniobj.h is always used on valid pointers and only cast to the > type the pointer is supposed to be. > > Only if things have already gone horribly wrong would miniobj.h > risk doing something undefined.
I was referring to question 13 (Null pointer representations) One of the responses suggests that NULL does not imply (void*)0, which miniobj.h assumes with memset. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
