>>Now, I think having function 1 as part of std_vmod is a good idea, >I don't think this belongs in std_vmod, it is a well defined >specialised type of functionality and that naturally belongs in >its own vmod I think.
With "own vmod" do you mean a vmod that can be part of the main distribution or a vmod that doesn't live in Varnish at all? >If somebody feels adventurous it could be a candidate for >vmod implemented VDP-based synthetic object generator. I'm sorry,but I don't really understand this statement. I don't get how involving VDP could simplify or improve such a vmod. -- Arianna Aondio Software Developer | Varnish Software AS Mobile: +47 98062619 We Make Websites Fly www.varnish-software.com _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
