> The other thing that I mentioned on Monday is modifying std.ip() to accept > [::1] and [::1]:80 as well.
It is kind of weird to have an IP address (as in std.ip) accept a port. It would probably be better to have something like std.addr for that. The underlying VCL_IP is confusing with this regard. My two cents: - std.ip could revert back to expecting "::1" instead of "[::1]" - std.addr could be used for the ip:port notation (as in varnishd -a) - documentation should clarify the ambiguity Cheers, Dridi _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
