-------- In message <CABoVN9DVoRbvHdOrYAM8WpKbfowoMfXQb5eGSEFfW_Ho=gn...@mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Bouke lmoune writes: >Sorry for the frenchism but it's turning into a "dialogue de sourd" :( > >> VCC is not involved in dynamic backends. > >I *know* that. > >In the "Writing a director" documentation I *recommend* directors >writers to back their director with a *VMOD object* > >[...] > >Crossing fingers that this time I'm making some sense.
Not really. VMOD objects are only usable if you know the number of such backends at the time you write your VCL code. What about VMODs that create an unknown number of backends ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
