-------- In message <[email protected]>, Geoff Simmons writes:
>I didn't want to get nitpicky about this at VUG, but there's a bit of >a problem with Varnish adding Surrogate-Control:ESI/1.0 to the backend >request header (whether by default or not), since Varnish does not in >fact support the full 1.0 ESI spec -- only the include and remove >tags. Yes, I was wondering about that issue too. (We also support esi comments, which is really just another kind of removes) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
