--------
In message
<CABoVN9DXmf=t6KhQsX=keApuz=wj8gx+-pnjq+88dom4jm_...@mail.gmail.com>, Dridi
Boukelmoune writes:
>> No, -i is shortcut for "I'm running in the build-tree" and it should
>> retain that meaning.
>
>Bit of misunderstanding here. I say that varnishtest -i already sets
>an appropriate PATH, so without a -D for instance ${varnishd} will
>always expand to varnishd.
>
>My question was about dropping the ${varnish*} macros and let
>varnishtest users do this kind of PATH setting, just like varnishtest
>-i currently does. I have no intention in changing the -i behavior.
Ohh, I'd forgotten about that. yes, in that case we should
drop the ${varnishstat} macros as well.
>> In the new world order, it should append appropriately to vmod_path.
>
>s/append/prepend/ ?
I guess the PATH codes sets the precedent that we prepend, and that
is probably the most robust choice
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
