-------- In message <cajv_h0yx8t4molpfk3krpukxuyotxhesf4ctatgu2qwftqv...@mail.gmail.com> , Federico Schwindt writes:
>If setting or using a storage cannot fail I'd say kill _hint (eventually) >and just use storage. > >If there is a chance of failing, I'd keep the _hint. I'd avoid having both. >Having backend_hint and backend is confusing enough already. I agree, and I'd like to kill backend_hint as well. That said, in both cases we need to deal with "no setting" and "vmod returning NULL". For backend, it's the default backend. Is it Transient for storage ? If so, I think we have a decision... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
