On 29/11/16 21:45, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> I will not object "unset beresp.body" but setting the body in the middle of
> vcl_backend_response{} feels odd to me.This seems to be the item with the least consensus. For the use case of replacing the body while keeping headers, the alternative is - copy response headers to bereq or - use a vmod to save them - resurrect them in v_b_e While this is feasible, I sill don't understand why we would need a de-tour over v_b_e just to create a synthetic body. Why would we - want unset beresp.body; - but not set beresp.body; ? Both need to abort the backend connection or drain the request in progress, the only difference would be if we end up with an empty ws non-empty object. Nils P.S.: Actually this is something which worked in varnish2, where one could just call synthetic in vcl_fetch _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
