-------- In message <CABoVN9Ad=r+qyagz1+_xyxbzovr6krhuyvobi44pyeguenm...@mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:
>I thought gcov'ed binaries could run concurrently if the underlying >file-system allowed it. I never had any issue with gcov and parallel >builds and regardless, if varnishtest spawns a varnishd, won't they >compete on coverage collection for libvarnish for instance? Last I tried it, I got totally screwed up numbers. (And no, because varnishtest waits for varnishd to exit before it exits.) >I don't know about simplest, running nightly builds from a script that >runs pseudo-continuously doesn't sound straightforward. if `date +%Y%m%d` changed do gcov ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
