-------- In message <CABoVN9C3z2X38q9yd0RF1DTaq0ybhPg+rZ967G3KS5M_=mc...@mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:
>We need to clear the confusion of turning hitpass into a hitmiss in >5.0, while keeping the MAIN.cache_hitpass counter as is. Especially >now that hitpass lives alongside hitmiss. Yes, there are a number of consequences that we need to attend to. >Also, should the built-in VCL make a distinction between hitmiss and >hitpass? IMO built-in VCL should never use hit-for-pass. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
