--------
In message <[email protected]>, Nils Goroll writ
es:
>* when representing time as a double, formatting a timestamp is now much more
> expensive (7x - 20x) than retrieving the time
So the interesting question for me now, is if we can shave if we
stick with double and simply by tweaking the formatting.
Something like:
printf("%ju.%06ju",
(uint64_t)floor(foo),
(uint64_t)floor((foo*1e6)) % 1000000UL);
(Obviously to be hidden with PF-like macro)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
