On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Nils Goroll <nils.gor...@uplex.de> wrote: > > On 12/04/2019 17:57, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > The prefix, which may be optional, and by nature is supposed to be the > > first field, and coincidentally is of variable length, is a problem. > > I do not understand why. The VSL client code which matches the prefix can do > so > against the string field as before, it is just not the start of the record > payload.
The prefix is too important as an optional field to move to the last position and jeopardize its presence because of vsl_reclen. Dridi _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
