For Authorisations, why don't pass the requests to the backend for the matching URLs as HEAD requests with Cookie: or Authorisation: headers in it then if the backend sends 200, Varnish send back the cached URL, if backend sends 403, the response is forwarded back to the enduser ?
Ask Bjørn Hansen writes: > > On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:24, cripy wrote: > > > Hello, I am curious to know whether anybody has had any success > > with caching files with HTTP authorization and still authorizing > > correctly. I have tried to implement the following VLC: > > I don't know if it can be done with VLC, but I'd like to point to the > perlbal "re-proxy" feature (for potential inspiration to varnish). > > The idea is that the proxy sends the request to the backend server, > the backend server (typically a "smart" server with DB access and > heavy memory footprint) authorizes the request and gives the proxy > another URL. The proxy then fetches the file from that URL > (typically on a "dumb" server) and sends it to the client. > > > - ask > > -- > http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
