Denis Brækhus writes: > ----- Damien Wetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you do have that information, however not in the ncsa logs, due to the > fact that the combined logformat does not have a field for that.. --> at the contrary of ncsa logs ,w3c logs are extensible, parametrable and allow the addition of such a field. > Use varnishlog for that information. > > > For me ESI are so web 1.0 , now the tendency is to deport the > > personalisation on the client side. > > Eh.. If you do believe that all web applications from this day on will be > javascript apps where all the content handling is on the client side, good > for you. Personally I think there will be a large number of sites / > applications where that will not apply. If we can have ESI in Varnish that > sounds like an excellent feature to me. We might or might not use it, > depending on the work to be done. Everyone can have its own opinion, mine is that the server side should do a minimum of work and let the client do it if possible ;) > > Writing it off as "web 1.0" isn't very constructive. > > Regards > -- > Denis Braekhus - Teknisk Ansvarlig ABC Startsiden AS > http://www.startsiden.no > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
