Hi, You could try and make a tcpdump of a slow session. "tcpdump -n -w varnish.pcap -e "host $PROXYHOST" might show you what is going on. If you have no success let me have a look.
Per. Yu, Ryan wrote: > That could be true. I believe we are actually using Surf Control. > > Would it be likely that this proxy would not affect Squid, yet would affect > Varnish? > > I ask, merely because Squid appears to be working properly. > > And I'd much rather use Varnish than Squid at this point and would like to > find a solution or at least an explanation so I can do some other testing > from a non-proxied location. > > -- > Cordially, > > Ryan Yu > -----Original Message----- > From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 6:04 AM > To: Yu, Ryan > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Strange Problem with Port 80 > > "Yu, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm having the strangest problem. I'm using varnish on some test >> servers and it works great when I run it on any random port number that >> is NOT port 80. >> > > My guess is that there is some sort of content-scanning transparent > proxy between you and the server. > > DES > -- Per Andreas Buer / Linpro AS t: 21 54 41 21 / m: 958 39 117 http://linpro.no/ - Ledende på Linux og åpen kildekode.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
