> > Use-cases differ of course, but I'm partial to the other way around. > Put Apache in front of Varnish and Varnish in front of Zope. And if > you need load balancing, insert something like Pound between Varnish > and the Zeo clients (although there is some work in Varnish trunk to > add load balancing). This configuration frees up Apache to serve > other stuff besides the Varnish cached content. > IMHO apache perf cannot rivalize with varnish , that's why I put them behind varnish. We have differents applications (differents apache) and varnish regex are sufficient to switch the traffic. Apache 2.2 (load balancing + mod_rewrite) is used to do load balancing on ZEO .In our case there are also hardware compression and load balancing in front of varnish.
but "Use-cases differ of course" and there are many good solutions and I am not using plone jean-marc > Ric > > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
