On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:39:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm鷨grav wrote: > Gea-Suan Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is that ok to running 32 varnishd and use HAProxy to redirect to them ? > > 32 Varnish instances? Sounds like a lot. What kind of site is it?
We're trying to serve images since the backend's I/O is not fast enough, so we need cache server to cache them. The original idea is use Varnish with "-s file,filename,100GB" to cache them, but varnish abort in SES_Delete. So the alternative is to run lots of varnishd and use HAProxy to dispatch the request. > > We found they will run out of memory. > > Hmm, you must be running 1.1; try switching to branches/1.2. It > shouldn't run out of memory. > > Here's a patch I think should help with the SES_Delete() issue, BTW. > I will commit it (or something similar) once I've confirmed that it > actually fixes the bug. Yes we run varnish-1.1 (install from ports), I'll try 1.2 with your patch. Thank you in advance. -- * Gea-Suan Lin (public key: Using https://keyserver.pgp.com/ to search) * If you cannot convince them, confuse them. -- Harry S Truman _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
