On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Michael S. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I were designing such a service, my choices would be: Corrections: > (1) 4 machines, each with 4-disk RAID 1 (fast, but dangerous) > (2) 4 machines, each with 5-disk RAID 5 (safe, fast reads, but slow > writes for your file size - also, RAID 5 should be battery backed, > which adds cost) > (3) 4 machines, each with 4-disk RAID 10 (will meet workload > requirement, but won't handle peak load in degraded mode) > (4) 5 machines, each with 4-disk RAID 10 > (5) 9 machines, each with 2-disk RAID 0 > > --Michael > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
