-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2008-3-17 17:56, C. Handel wrote: | On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Augustin Amann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> I'm thinking about the same idea of a reverse-proxy cache cluster for work. |> I think that one way of doing that is to use HaProxy (*haproxy*.1wt.eu) |> which implement such hash function. You could use it in front of |> Varnish, with a URL based balance algorithm ... Should work ok for this |> job, even if this could be great to do that in varnish directly. | | You might be interessted in using http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ | to build the loadbalancer part. You could route the traffic using | sticky connections to the right backend server. It is even possible | that the LVS Servers see only the incoming traffic not the replies. | This is an important feature if the limit of one gigbit interface is | reached.
I'm afraid that LVS can not do URI based load balancing. LVS is an IP-level rather than application-level LBer. If you have different domains, that's troublesome. | Greetings | Christoph | _______________________________________________ | varnish-misc mailing list | [email protected] | http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc - -- Rgds, Cherife. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQFH3lLrD+6zYVqA6cMRAgpkAJ9oJwanTXF/ghuwLQTmPUraMjx69ACfRmm9 giOaPzp095FpexsVGTq+Rco= =Vp1q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
