On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Michael S. Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Simon Lyall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Michael S. Fischer wrote: > > > That said, it wouldn't make sense to entirely deallocate your swap > > > space, since the kernel may decide to page or swap out processes other > > > than Varnish. > > > > and what is wrong with that? Surely your RAM is better being used by the > > main applications on the server ( Varnish ) rather than "sitting around > > and waiting" copies of sshd, cron and getty? > > Huh? Nothing I said contradicts that.
Sorry, I read " wouldn't " as " would " [1] . [1] Approx 7 times. -- Simon J. Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/ "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
