On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Michael S. Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Michael S. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >>> +1 on stale-while-revalidate. I found this one to be real handy. >> >> Another +1 > > I should add a qualifier to my vote, that stale-while-revalidate > generally is used to mask suboptimal backend performance and so I > discourage it in favor of fixing the backend. > > --Michael
Of course the main premise of a reverse-proxy cache is to mask suboptimal backend performance. :-) Ric _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
