In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mich ael S. Fischer" writes:
>> Varnish for instance assumes that the administrator is not a total >> madman, who would do something as patently stupid as you prospose >> above, under the general assumption that if he were, varnish would >> be the least of his troubles. > >I'm not saying that they would; I'm just saying that you can't count >on user 'nobody' having the precise role that a security-conscious >sysadmin would want. Which is why there is a -u argument, for people who muck up the configuration that has been standard on all decent UNIX'es for the last 15 years. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
