On Fri, 2 May 2008 02:41:11 -0700, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The problem with the example zope-plone.vcl is that it excludes ALL > cookie-authenticated responses -- even those inline images, css, and > javascript files that otherwise would be cacheable in downstream > caches -- making authenticated browsing unnecessarily taxing on the > backend. That's certainly true, yes. The zope-plone.vcl example is not in any way efficient for authenticated sessions. As I recall, it was originally used for sites which did not publish through Varnish at all, or used authenticated sessions. I'll look at the points in this thread, test a bit, and update the example. The plone.recipe.varnish template looks especially nice. Are there any good reasons not to run Plone with the CacheFu (or CacheSetup) product installed? Would a non-CacheFu example be of any use? -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, Linpro _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
