In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1? Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= writes:
>It doesn't really answer your question - but it usually makes sense to >serve the static content (css/js/images) from a completely different >domain. For example at http://www.yellowbot.com/ we use st.ypbot.net >to have a domain that's "cookie free" for static content. Yahoo >uses "l.yimg.com". > >You don't want the browsers to "upload" the cookies a gazillion times >to a server that doesn't even look at them anyway. This also gives >you more flexibility to have your site served by one set of servers >and the static content served by another set of servers. And just to be totally clear: you need different domains because that's what cookies select on but you can serve the domains from the same servers if you want. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
