In message <[email protected]>, Ricardo N ewbery writes: > >On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <768C2A99-6D24-4D6F- >> [email protected]>, Ricardo N >> ewbery writes: >>> Cool... so why do you figure that backwards compatibility is not >>> possible? If my old purge scripts now start "purging" rather than >>> "banning", why should anything break? >> >> Purge wouldn't be a CLI command > >Ah, okay... why not?
Because you don't have a cached object at hand to purge, all you can do from the CLI is to add bans that will deal with the objects when they are found in the cache later on. Your question is -exactly- why I want the rename: purge sounds like something happens to the object right now, and that is not possible from the CLI context. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
