In message <[email protected]>, Tim Kientzle wri tes:
>It also appears that Varnish eventually exits completely >if placed under high load. I'm okay with that as long as it's >intentional behavior; It is not intentional. The entire point about the two-process trick is to not ever throw in the towel if we can avoid it. That said, there are classes of bugs for which we have no hope, if for instance the manager process cannot fork or allocate memory, then we are hosed top and bottom. >Of course, >I understand that killing the child and starting a new one >will also lose the cache, which is obviously not particularly >desirable under heavy load. Persistent storage coming up in version 2.1 :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
