On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Lazy wrote: (...) > setting 500 as min threads didn't make any diference, funny thing is > that failed requests are in logged in apache as succesful
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: The output from varnishstat didn't indicate that threads was the issue causing 503s. It was more of a tuning-comment than a shot at solving the real problem. Sorry about the confusion. > 09:23:50.563934 IP x.x.x.x.51235 > x.x.x.x.88: S > 1066103134:1066103134(0) win 32792 <mss 16396,sackOK,timestamp > 552835403 0,nop,wscale 7> (....) Is it possible for you to mail me the raw cap-file? (Feel free to obfuscate the IPs, but I'm really more of an ethereal-man than tcpdump-output...). Feel free to drop it directly to me, if that makes it easier. > successful POST in apache logs, > > in varnishlog > > 14 Backend c 15 default default (...) The request must've started earlier, as this is just the backend request. Do you have the entire transaction available? (...) > restart shouldn't make another backend connection if current one got closed ? It should, but it should be noted that: 1. We don't know _why_ it fails. 2. Restart in vcl_error is brand new, so there might still be some issues. You could try to turn on vcl-trace. (-p vcl_trace=on). Also, could you post your VCL in it's entirety? (If you already did, I must've missed it.) -- Kristian Lyngstøl Redpill Linpro AS Tlf: +47 21544179 Mob: +47 99014497
pgp6OC1UYDneP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
