ok, this time it's completely wedged. it's resetting all new tcp connections to the process. if i check status through the mangament port, says the child is alive.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:19 AM, David Birdsong<[email protected]> wrote: > misses favor 1e-2[s] with a few at 1e-1[s] > > > after retesting on a 16Gb machine, i'm getting much better results. > but still after varnish consumes all ram, iowait goes up, process load > skyrockets to like 2200 processes marked for run. sometimes varnish > recovers in 5 minutes and others in about 1 minute. this makes me > think that all the threads are piling up for something like access to > the lru list. > > when i first starting testing tonight, the first pile-up was at 1 hour > which was what my lru_interval was set to. i've since reduced via > varnishadm to 10 mins and it now hangs as soon as ram is > consumed(which takes a little over 10 mins). i tried re-raising it to > 3600 and even 4200, but it still seems to pile up sooner. > > here's what a few graphs look like... > http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/9300/hourlyvarnishhang.png > > aside from these pile-ups, i'm almost to a workable state. though i'd > like to increase the backends to 5-6 if possible. > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp<[email protected]> wrote: >> In message <[email protected]>, >> David >> Birdsong writes: >> >> What does your responstimes look like in varnishhist ? >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >> [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >> > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
