Poul-Henning Kamp napsal(a): > In message <[email protected]>, =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBCw61sZWs=?= > writes: > >> our sess_timeout is set to 1sec alredy :( > > Then I doubt keepalives are your problem > > It is much more likely you have workerthreads waiting to push stuff > to slow clients. I think that is not the problem... when I disable keepalive by seting "connection: close" header then i get 4x higher throughput ( but works bad in IE6) ... till the 8K established connection everithing works fine (low latency responses, only 10%cpu usage on server, load around 1-2)
... the problem is that ther is by estimation around 150K of clients which is imposible to handle with keepalive enabled the webserver cluster we use till now had the same problem ... keepalive even set to 1 second causes so many opend connection that system stoped working... > > Consider increasing your kernels tcp sendbuffers ? set large enough for 95% of requests is it at all posible to implement global sesion_timeout=0? or is it a design problem? _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
