Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:16:20PM -0400, Nathan Kinkade wrote: > For some reason Varnish (2.0.4) doesn't seem to be respecting the > Content-Range header, so our users are unable to resume large > downloads that somehow got interrupted. Is this expected and normal > behavior, or should this work? Do we need to add a rule in vcl_recv > that passes any incoming requests containing a Content-Range header > directly to the backend?
We currently do not have support for range-headers, so you'll have to pipe these requests. Note that pass wont do the trick, since it'll still be "cached"/buffered in varnish (but immediately discarded). -- Kristian Lyngstøl Redpill Linpro AS Tlf: +47 21544179 Mob: +47 99014497
pgpjLt5mA5sEr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
