This is sliding off topic, and is in no way meant as a comparison to Traffic Server, but...
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:45:05AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > «We have benchmarked Traffic Server to handle in excess of 35,000 RPS on > a single box.» > > I know Kristian has benchmarked Varnish to about three times that, > though with 1-byte objects, so it's not really anything resembling a > real-life scenario. I think sky has been serving ~64k requests/s using > synthetic. I got it up to roughly 150k req/s and I still think that's a client-issue. I know Nicholas had a favicon serving at 60k req/s without any hassle (after session_linger was set up). I'm reasonably certain that I can get close to breaking 300k req/s on a dual quad core with ht, but I don't think I can convince anyone to lend me a small city worth of computers to generate the traffic. -- Kristian Lyngstøl Redpill Linpro AS Tlf: +47 21544179 Mob: +47 99014497
pgpNE0IWPK6vE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
