On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Michael Fischer <mich...@dynamine.net>wrote:
I'm all for putting backend hashing into Varnish for the purpose of routing > requests to backends based on a consistent hash of the request parameters -- > and there's no reason why the backend can't be another Varnish instance. > But the appropriate use of this is to more efficiently utilize cache memory > by associating an object with a designated Varnish server in a pool, not for > HA. This was one of my first requests that still (alas) has seen no > traction. > Although now that haproxy does it, my request may now be moot. --Michael
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
