In message <53c652a09719c54da24741d0157cb26904c5f...@tfprdexs1.tf1.groupetf1.fr
>> It's probably simplest to paraphrase the code: >> >> Calculate hash over full complement of backends. >> Is the selected backend sick >> Calculate hash over subset of healthy backends > >Let's get back to consistent hashing and it's use... > >Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this mean that adding a new >varnish instance implies a full rehash ? Yes, that is pretty much guaranteed to be the cost with any stateless hashing. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
