Yes, but the workarounds seem to replace x-forwarded-for with another header, e.g., X-Real-Forwarded-For (https://wiki.fourkitchens.com/display/PF/Workaround+for+Varnish+X-Forwarded-For+bug).
And the FAQ entry (http://varnish-cache.org/wiki/FAQ#HowcanIlogtheclientIPaddressonthebackend) seems to assume that there is nothing fronting Varnish that has already added an x-forwarded-for header (which is what the bug is about). In any case, I assume that the fix for bug 601 will go into the next release . . . On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:42 PM, pablort <pablort+varn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you tried google "varnish x-forwarded-for" ? > > There an FAQ entry addressing that (somewhat). > > []'s > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, John Norman <j...@7fff.com> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf. >> http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release? >> >> My Varnish gets a x-forwarded-for from another server: What will the >> VCL be to use that instead of whatever Varnish tries to append? >> >> John >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no >> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
