On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > It should be. You'll lose the last storage silo (since that's not > closed yet), but older objects should be available.
This might be the source of the confusion. How often are silos closed? My testing was simply "hit the cache for a single object a few times to increase obj.hits, bounce varnish, next request was a miss". If I can get a handle on how often silos are closed, I can more accurately check the behavior under production load. > Can you see if you can reproduce and post a varnishlog -1 when the child > has restarted as well as after having restarted the parent? Will do, thanks. -- Ken > | Maybe there's a graceful, undocumented method of stopping the parent that > I'm not aware of? > > Shouldn't matter. > > -- > Tollef Fog Heen > Redpill Linpro -- Changing the game! > t: +47 21 54 41 73 _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
