In message <4b793e98.2020...@schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes: >Poul-Henning, >
>Just an idea from checking differences between the code I use and trunk: In >cnt_wait, shouldn't we check pfd[0].revents for POLLERR and POLLHUP? Could it >be >that Solaris assumes that delivery an error once should suffice, so further >use >of the fd will return EBADF? That was one of my theories, but it does not fit the facs of the case, and it would violate POSIX, which I doubt Solaris would do... The best contender is still that varnish closes the fd by mistake, but I'll be damned if I can find where... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
