On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ken Brownfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd also add that by definition, SSL represents data that is secure between > the server and the user. Caching that data (or having it even pass through a > cache) is conceptually incompatible. > > Obviously, SSL pages often contain static content (images), which would be > nice to serve from a cache. Well, which is it? Is there a use case for SSL support in a caching proxy, or isn't there? I don't follow your argument. --Michael _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
