On 6/26/2010 2:44 PM, Per Buer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Ben Nowacky
<[email protected]> wrote:
NOpe, this is a dedicated server.. We're running CentOs... How do you know
we're running 32-bit version? I had to compile from source on CentOS, so just
grabbed the binaries from the site and did a build from them. How are you
guessing it's 32-bit?
Definitely not familiar with analyzing core-dumps or even getting them to
run... I'm not a sys-admin, just the guy stuck trying to get our servers ready
for an onslaught of traffic coming next week that I know we can not handle
right now....
Then seriously, reinstall that server with a 64 bit OS. I haven't
heard of anyone thats been running 32bit Varnish in production for the
last two years and having it run stable. The CC-people did for some
time but I believe they migrated due some issues.
That's a pretty bold statement. Among the 1000's of machines that I
administer daily, I have several running varnish on 32-bit archs. You
may not of heard of this in the past two years, but now you can say,
you've heard of _two_ people running varnish on 32-bit archs, even if I
don't exclusively run it on 32-bit archs. ;P
If you can't do that, reduce the number of threads to an absolute
minimum, reduce the cache to max 1G, and reduce the stack size until
it's stable.
I concur.
Cheers!
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this
message. See http://www.datapipe.com/about-us-legal-email-disclaimer.htm for
further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic
communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply
message and we will send the contents to you.
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
