Hi Bob Ah, I understand now.
I assumed the * in Ruslan's example was just for me to change and insert the relevant filename, I see now he actually meant it as a literal '*'. Oops. That is interesting to know the rpm can resolve interlinking dependencies like that, an upgrade will be considerably faster if I don't need to uninstall, reinstall and then reconfigure. Thank you for the clarification. Regards Glen From: Bob Camp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 11:18 AM To: Glen Kelly Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Varnish 2.1.4 rpm's - bad key error when installing on Centos 5.5 x86 Hi If you have both of the files present you can do a rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish* That will get rid of the failed dependency issue. Bob On Nov 4, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Glen Kelly wrote: Hi Ruslan That sort of worked, I had to use the -nosignature flag instead. Also because of dependencies it would not let me upgrade, I had to uninstall and reinstall. But big negative is that it breaks the rpm -q option. Until these rpm's are fixed I cannot use them in production. I assume the developers read this mailing list but in case they don't how do I go about raising a bug report? (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish-libs-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: varnish-libs = 2.1.3-1.el5 is needed by (installed) varnish-2.1.3-1.el5.x86_64 (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: varnish-libs = 2.1.4-1.el5 is needed by varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64 (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -qa | grep varn varnish-libs-2.1.3-1.el5 varnish-2.1.3-1.el5 (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -e varnish-2.1.3-1.el5 warning: /etc/varnish/default.vcl saved as /etc/varnish/default.vcl.rpmsave warning: /etc/sysconfig/varnish saved as /etc/sysconfig/varnish.rpmsave warning: /etc/logrotate.d/varnish saved as /etc/logrotate.d/varnish.rpmsave (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -e varnish-libs-2.1.3-1.el5 (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -i varnish-libs-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -i varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -qa | grep varn error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 395 Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 394 Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# service varnish start Starting varnish HTTP accelerator: [ OK ] (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# service varnishlog start Starting varnish logging daemon: [ OK ] (r...@bolrpdev1:/tmp)# varnishd -V varnishd (varnish-2.1.4 SVN 5447M) Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Linpro AS / Verdens Gang AS Regards Glen <tasfire_wakeup_small4cad.jpg><http://www.fire.tas.gov.au/mysite/Show?pageId=colDayLightSavings> P Do you need to print this? Consider the environment, prevent paper waste. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. From: Ruslan Sivak [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 12:47 AM To: Glen Kelly Subject: Re: Varnish 2.1.4 rpm's - bad key error when installing on Centos 5.5 x86 The workaround is to download the 2 rpms manually and run rpm --signature -Uvh varnish* I hope whoever is generating the rpms fixes this soon as well as generates some x32 rpms. Is this possibly the wrong list to ask for this? Should it be on the dev list, or should I file an issue in the bug tracker? Russ On Nov 4, 2010 1:42 AM, "Glen Kelly" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi > > I am receiving the same errors as described here when installing on Centos > 5.5 x86. > > error: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb > > Is there a known solution? > > Also will the 2.1.4 rpm's be eventually available from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/varnish/files/? > > Regards Glen > <tasfire_wakeup_small4cad.jpg>_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
